Teleworking and Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Teleworking has spread drastically during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its effect on musculo-skeletal disorders (MSD) remains unclear. We aimed to make a qualitative systematic review on the effect of teleworking on MSD. Following the PRISMA guidelines, several databases were searched using strings based on MSD and teleworking keywords. A two-step selection process was used to select relevant studies and a risk of bias assessment was made. Relevant variables were extracted from the articles included, with a focus on study design, population, definition of MSD, confounding factors, and main results. Of 205 studies identified, 25 were included in the final selection. Most studies used validated questionnaires to assess MSD, six considered confounders extensively, and seven had a control group. The most reported MSD were lower back and neck pain. Some studies found increased prevalence or pain intensity, while others did not. Risk of bias was high, with only 5 studies with low/probably low risk of bias. Conflicting results on the effect of teleworking on MSD were found, though an increase in MSD related to organizational and ergonomic factors seems to emerge. Future studies should focus on longitudinal approaches and consider ergonomic and work organization factors as well as socio-economic status.

Cardiac Arrest Management in the Workplace: Improving but Not Enough?

The aim was to describe out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring in the workplace of a large emergency network, and compare the evolution of their management in the last 15 years. A retrospective study based on data from the Northern Alps Emergency Network compared characteristics of OHCA between cases in and out the workplace, and between cases occurring from January 2004 to December 2010 and from January 2011 to December 2017. Among the 15,320 OHCA cases included, 320 occurred in the workplace (2.1%). They were more often in younger men, and happened more frequently in an area with access to public defibrillation, had more often a shockable rhythm, had a cardiopulmonary resuscitation started by a bystander more frequently, and had a better outcome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation started by a bystander was the only chain of survival link that improved for cases occurring after December 2010. Workplace OHCA seems to be managed more effectively than others; however, only a slight survival improvement was observed, suggesting that progress is still needed.

Ethical tensions in the treatment of youth with severe anorexia nervosa.

Treatment of anorexia nervosa poses a moral quandary for clinicians, particularly in paediatrics. The challenges of appropriately individualising treatment while balancing prospective benefits against concomitant harms are best highlighted through exploration and discussion of the ethical issues. The purpose of this Viewpoint is to explore the ethical tensions in treating young patients (around ages 10-18 years) with severe anorexia nervosa who are not capable of making treatment-based decisions and describe how harm reduction can reasonably be applied. We propose the term AN-PLUS to refer to the subset of patients with a particularly concerning clinical presentation-poor quality of life, lack of treatment response, medically severe and unstable, and severe symptomatology-who might benefit from a harm reduction approach. From ethics literature, qualitative studies, and our clinical experience, we identify three core ethical themes in making treatment decisions for young people with AN-PLUS: capacity and autonomy, best interests, and person-centred care. Finally, we consider how a harm reduction approach can provide direction for developing a personalised treatment plan that retains a focus on best interests while attempting to mitigate the harms of involuntary treatment. We conclude with recommendations to operationalise a harm reduction approach in young people with AN-PLUS.

Comparison of different estimators of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic activity on geographical and temporal levels.

Background: Studies began investigating occupational exposures as a source of contamination to SARS-CoV-2, yet few considered the variation in SARS-Cov2 pandemic activity for these exposures. Several indicators were built to assess SARS-Cov2 activity though they usually serve a specific purpose and have limitations. The aim was to compare qualitatively different estimators of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic activity and to create an estimator of pandemic activity level based on daily hospital admissions for job-exposure matrices (JEM) usage. Methods: From publicly available French databases, we retrieved all data from March 19, 2020 (first day available) to March 25, 2021 (day of data collection) on four different estimators: percentage of intensive care bed occupied, reproductive number, tests' positive rate and number positive tests. An indicator based on new daily hospital admissions was created for a COVID JEM. Due to the heterogeneity of the estimators, a qualitative comparison was carried out. Results: During the study period, three major outbreaks took place. Though the number of positive tests was the first indicator to worsen during the 2nd outbreak, it failed to identify variation during the outbreak. Though each indicators behaved differently during the study period, the indicator based on new daily hospital admissions and the positive rate seemed to be the closest to one another. Conclusion: This study highlights the heterogeneity of the indicators used during the first and second SARS-Cov2 outbreaks in France. An indicator based on new daily hospital admissions seems to be a good candidate for estimating SARS-CoV-2 epidemic activity for COVID JEMs and is easily available in countries where usual indicators are not commonly accessible.

Association between COVID-19 infection and work exposure assessed by the Mat-O-Covid job exposure matrix in the CONSTANCES cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light a new occupational health threat. We aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19 infection and work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 assessed by a job-exposure matrix (JEM), in a large population cohort. We also estimated the population-attributable fraction among exposed subjects. METHODS: We used the SAPRIS-SERO sample of the CONSTANCES cohort, limited to subjects actively working, and with a job code available and a questionnaire on extra work activities. The following outcomes were assessed: COVID-19 diagnosis was made by a physician; a seropositivity to the ELISA-S test ('serology strict') and ELISA-S test intermediate with positive ELISA-NP or a positive neutralising antibodies SN ('serology large'). Job exposure was assessed using Mat-O-Covid, an expert-based JEM with an Index used as a continuous variable and a threshold at 13/1000. RESULTS: The sample included 18 999 subjects with 389 different jobs, 47.7% were men with a mean age of 46.2 years (±9.2 years). The Mat-O-Covid index taken as a continuous variable or with a threshold greater than 13/1000 was associated with all the outcomes in bivariable and multivariable logistic models. ORs were between 1.30 and 1.58, and proportion of COVID-19 attributable to work among exposed participants was between 20% and 40%. DISCUSSION: Using the Mat-O-Covid JEM applied to a large population, we found a significant association between work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 infection, though the estimation of attributable fraction among exposed people remained low to moderate. Further studies during other exposed periods and with other methods are necessary.

Impact psychologique de la crise sanitaire COVID-19 sur les soignants d’une unité temporaire de réanimation hors les murs : étude observationnelle monocentrique et contrôlée

Contexte La crise sanitaire engendrée par la COVID-19 a eu un impact majeur sur le système de soin et les soignants. L’attention à porter aux professionnels du soin est indispensable, et passe par l’identification des facteurs de risques pour leur santé psychique. Dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI) la crise sanitaire a induit un stress professionnel important du fait de l’afflux de patients, de l’exposition au virus et du manque de connaissance de ce virus. L’étude présentée a pour objectif d’évaluer et comparer l’impact psychosocial de la crise COVID-19 sur les soignants exerçant dans une USI standard versus une USI ad hoc gérée par les anesthésistes en salle de réveil ou salle d’opération, dans le même hôpital universitaire. Méthode L’étude est une enquête transversale composée de questionnaires validés (HADS, Brief COPE, CBI et PCLS), de question sociodémographiques et d’un questionnaire ad hoc sur les caractéristiques professionnelles, soumis ç l’ensemble des professionnels travaillant dans les deux USI d’un hôpital Universitaire Français, d’avril à mai 2020. Une régression logistique a été réalisée pour identifier les facteurs de risques indépendants de l’anxiété, la dépression, le burnout et l’état de stress post traumatique (ESPT) ;avec une valeur significative pour un p < 0,05. Résultats Le taux de réponse était de 76 % (66/84) et 84 % (142/168), respectivement dans les USI ad hoc et standard. L’anxiété est statistiquement plus fréquente dans l’unité ad hoc que la standard 3,01 IC 95 % [1,24 ;7,29] p 0,014). Il n’y a pas de différence significative entre les ICU concernant les incidences de la dépression, le burnout et l’ESPT. L’analyse multivariée révèle que le genre féminin et le travail en USI ad hoc était des facteurs de risque d’anxiété. Le genre féminin et l’usage de psychotrope étaient liée à la dépression. Le burnout était lié au sentiment de protection et à l’usage de psychotrope. Aucun facteur de risque significatif n’a été identifié pour l’ESPT. Conclusion L’évaluation de l’impact psychosocial sur les professionnels travaillant en USI classique ou ad hoc dans le même hôpital révèle des facteurs de risque spécifiques pour l’anxiété, le burnout et la dépression. Ces informations doivent être prise en compte dans l’adaptation des structures de soin pour de futures organisations de crise.

Mat-O-Covid: Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) Using Data from a National Compensation System for Occupational COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the validity of the Mat-O-Covid Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) on SARS-CoV-2 using compensation data from the French National Health Insurance compensation system for occupational-related COVID-19. METHODS: Deidentified compensation data for occupational COVID-19 in France were obtained between August 2020 and August 2021. The case acceptance was considered as the reference. Mat-O-Covid is an expert-based French JEM on workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Bi- and multivariable models were used to study the association between the exposure assessed by Mat-O-Covid and the reference, as well as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: In the 1140 cases included, there was a close association between the Mat-O-Covid index and the reference (p < 0.0001). The overall predictivity was good, with an AUC of 0.78 and an optimal threshold at 13 per thousand. Using Youden's J statistic resulted in 0.67 sensitivity and 0.87 specificity. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios were significant: 4.9 [2.4-6.4] and 0.4 [0.3-0.4], respectively. DISCUSSION: It was possible to assess Mat-O-Covid's validity using data from the national compensation system for occupational COVID-19. Though further studies are needed, Mat-O-Covid exposure assessment appears to be accurate enough to be used in research.

Matrice emplois-exposition pour le SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) :Création de « Mat-O-Covid », validité et perspectives

Résumé L’évaluation de l’exposition est difficile pour le chercheur du domaine des risques professionnels. L’objectif du travail est de développer et de valider une matrice emplois-exposition (MEE) pour l'exposition professionnelle au SARS-CoV-2 appelée " Mat-O-Covid ". Grâce à un groupe d’expert français, la matrice a été développée pour tous les travailleurs sur la profession et les catégories socioprofessionnelles de 2003 (avec une passerelle de transcodage vers la Classification internationale type des professions de 2008) et un focus sur le secteur de soin et médicosocial. La moyenne des codages des experts a été utilisée comme estimation pour l’exposition « sujets » (collègues et/ou public) et « patients » pour le focus secteurs sanitaires, ainsi que la probabilité de prévention pour chaque. Les corrélations intraclasses ont été considérés comme bonnes à excellentes, sauf pour la prévention en santé. Comparées à la matrice américaine O*Net, l’évaluation a été considérée comme satisfaisante. En conclusion, une MEE "Mat-O-Covid" fournissant une probabilité d'exposition professionnelle au SARS-CoV-2 aura des implications pour la recherche et en santé publique, sous réserve de connaître ses limites et de poursuivre sa validation. While exposure assessment is complex for the occupational risk researcher, the objective of our work is to develop and validate a job-exposure matrix (JEM) for SARS-CoV-2 exposure called “Mat-O-Covid” project (“COVID-Mate” in French). A group of French experts, the JEM was developed for all workers using the 2003 Occupation and Socioprofessional Categories (with a transcoding gateway to the 2008 International Standard Classification of Occupations) and a focus on the health and care sector. The average of the experts' coding was used as estimates for both estimates, exposure "subjects" (colleagues and/or public) and "patients" for the focus on the health and care sector, as well as the probability of prevention for each. Intraclass correlations were considered good to excellent except for health prevention. Compared to the United States O*Net JEM, the evaluation was considered as fair. In conclusion, a "Mat-O-Covid" JEM providing a probability of occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 will have implications for research and public health, taking into account that its limitations are known, and its validation is still in progress.